A nice little SEO tool

Comments (0)

Seositecheckup.com is useful. That’s all I had to say.

Partyenbeaute.com is live

Comments (0)

Fresh out of its sandbox environment is the new website for Party en Beauté, a new Granby-based event decoration rental service. It’s my first public work as a web developer (unless you count Trly.gd) and I’d appreciate some input.

Jpeg background not showing up in IE? Try this

Comments (0)

If you have a JPEG image from your graphic designer that refuses to display in Internet Explorer even after triple-checking the CSS and the markup, check if it’s formatted in CMYK instead of RGB. It’s a stupid little mistake, but it might take quite some time and a lot of cuss words before you figure out what’s wrong.

With Photoshop, select Image>Mode>RGB to fix this problem.

If that isn’t the problem, consider revisiting the code and make sure the image format used is supported by all browsers.

DeviceROMs.com

Comments (0)

I just bought the domain deviceroms.com. This will soon become host to a Windows Mobile ROM catalog where cooks can post their hacked firmware. All the crunchy details can be found right here.

CSS is old, bad and inefficient, what’s up with that?

Comments (3)

After a few years of playing with various kinds of code, I started to take a serious look into web development. It took me less than a few minutes to realize I absolutely had to know CSS to get going in the webdev world. Three months later I still don’t have a clue of whatever the fuck this language is up to. Let me get this straight: CSS is bad, very, very bad.

I wanted to do something pretty simple today: align a textbox in a square. That kind of stuff would be simple with any programming language, but with CSS, it’s a whole another thing. For some reason, the one language that holds the graphical web together performs awfully at laying out your shit. Don’t get me wrong, I know it can be done with a few hours of intensive research and trial-and-error, but it doesn’t simply work, and the web is ALL about laying things out.

CSS does not do simple things simply. A ridiculously simple design like mine (a textbox in a rounded rectangle centered in a page), 2 hours after I started trying, still isn’t working. I know I’m not an experienced coder, but shouldn’t centering stuff vertically be easy as pie? I don’t have to hack the shit out of my shoes to kick things with them, so why should I have to spend an hour on Google to center a fucking textbox?

What is wrong, I’d say, is that CSS is still playing with webpages expecting that websites are mostly text-based. In a world of shapes, colors and images, how can something akin to a document editor handle graphical user interfaces? Shouldn’t we already have something closer to coordinate-based layout as of 2009? It looks – at least to me – that it would be simple to create a website with Java/C++/Basic than with HTML and CSS. Making an executable that looks and acts the same as a webpage would take – what – a quarter of the time?

An easy, foolproof favicon generator

Comments (0)

Looking for an easy way to generate a favicon for my blog, I stumbled upon this wonderful tool. It couldn’t be simpler or work better. Click for DeGraeve’s favicon generator.

Mad props to its creator.